Which global hedge fund strategies have the most to offer in a post-COVID world?
The opportunity set for many hedge fund strategies is the best it has been for a number of years. In response to the most challenging market environment since 2008, unprecedented fiscal and monetary responses from governments and central banks have created dislocations and distortions in many asset classes.
Volatility has returned to equities, bond yields have fallen dramatically, and inflation fears have stoked demand for precious metals. That said, identifying hedge funds that will be successful is incredibly challenging in an industry with over 4,000 funds managing over $2.92 trillion of assets. Furthermore, given the unconstrained nature of most hedge funds, dispersion within each broad-based hedge fund strategy is much higher when compared to the long-only world, where different strategies are typically benchmarked to an appropriate index. Manager selection is an increasingly important component when deciding which hedge funds are best placed to capitalise in a post-COVID world.
12 months to August 2020 – Strategy Performance
In order to identify which hedge funds have the most to offer, one has to identify what problem hedge funds are being used to solve. Are they being used to diversify away from a traditional portfolio of equities and bonds? Or are they being used to gain exposure to a particular asset class in a more risk-adjusted fashion? We frequently see investors using hedge funds as a portfolio diversifier but then invest in hedge funds that are correlated to their existing investments, especially during market dislocations. The hedge fund industry is dominated by equity long short funds and data from Aurum’s Hedge Fund Data Engine show that most offer very little diversification benefits with the strategy having a correlation to MSCI World Index of 0.92 over the last five years and 0.81 since 2000.
Investors should have a clear understanding of the investment and risk management processes of a particular hedge fund and an appreciation of how it is likely to react in different market environments within one’s wider portfolio. Furthermore, ensuring a fund is operationally robust is arguably of the greatest importance.
While the opportunity set is positive, the current environment presents a number of challenges to managers; the prospect of multiple waves of COVID-19, the timing of a potential vaccine, the upcoming US election, and ongoing US-China trade tensions. So, which global hedge fund strategies have the most to offer in a post-COVID world? Arguably, strategies that are liquid and nimble may allow managers to hedge or reduce exposure rapidly if required. March was a timely example of how liquidity can dry up during a stressed scenario, prices gap down and managers struggle to cut risk. Investing in managers that are cognisant of this and are able to react accordingly is crucial.
Global macro funds have had many critics in recent years with many well-known funds struggling to generate attractive returns since 2008. However, 2020 has seen the renaissance of global macro with the environment providing a more fertile environment for the strategy.
The unprecedented nature of central bank intervention across the world has seen rates fall synchronously. Central bank independence continues to erode in many developed market economies with monetary and fiscal policy goals increasingly in tandem. What will be the result of the increasing indebtedness across the world? Will this ultimately lead to inflation? Or will the increasing levels of unemployment be deflationary? Global macro funds have a “go anywhere approach” and can often seek medium term thematic trades where they see the best risk/return opportunities. Recent themes have included notable positioning in precious metals and currencies. Gold, often seen as a hedge against inflation and currency debasement, has been a consensus macro trade of late, hitting all-time highs in August. Short US dollar positioning has also been a common theme as US support packages go further than most other countries. With rates effectively anchored at zero in the US and negative in Europe, fixed income volatility has fallen and macro traders are increasingly looking at currency markets to generate returns.
Global macro funds can also seek structural trades, where recurring patterns typically driven by investor flows that move markets on a repeatable basis are identified. An example of this behaviour can be observed during the final few weeks of each quarter end as rebalancing by large institutional portfolios can lead to significant buying or selling pressure. The sharp sell-off in equities during March, helped support the notable buying pressure during the final two weeks of the month as portfolios rebalanced to fall in line with their strategic asset allocations. Clearly, in this instance, there were other competing factors, as is often the case, but making small bets on multiple recurring events can be a profitable strategy for global macro funds. The effects of COVID-19 could exacerbate these moves if flows are substantial going forward.
The flexible nature of global macro funds are also often seen by some investors as a hedge against a rising rate environment. While it is not widely anticipated that rates will rise in the near future, one has to take increasing amounts of duration risk, credit risk or liquidity risk in the search for yield, thus increasing risk on the downside.
The term multi-strategy is very broad and they have the ability to dynamically allocate capital depending on where the best opportunity set lies. Many multi-strategy funds have significant allocations to discretionary long short equity strategies, quant equity strategies, global macro, fixed income relative value, credit and event driven strategies.
Multi-strategy funds include of some of the strongest hedge fund businesses in the industry. This gives them the ability to attract the best talent, invest heavily in systems and employ incredibly sophisticated risk management frameworks. The resources available to the top funds are almost unparalleled and they have demonstrated an ability to generate consistent returns, while protecting capital over nearly 30 years.
A key component of many multi-strategy funds are discretionary long short equity strategies. As previously noted, the majority of equity long short funds offer very little diversification benefits primarily due to the fact that the majority are nearly always structurally net long equities, and as such, often struggle in equity market sell-offs.
Conversely, multi-strategy funds take a more market neutral approach to equity long short investing, typically employing sector specialists with a clear understanding of sector dynamics and an appreciation of relative outperformers, while limiting existential market risks. In a post-COVID word, single stock equity dispersion has returned as there will be winners and losers resulting from the current environment. Fundamental stock pickers with a trading orientated approach should therefore thrive in this environment and those with a lower net exposure should also be better placed to protect capital in an equity market sell-off.
Quant equity and statistical arbitrage strategies also have lot to offer in a post-COVID world. These strategies are typically dependent on elevated levels of volatility and volume to be successful, as such the last two quarters have proven to be an exceptionally good environment for these strategies. A continuation of this environment should continue to be positive.
In any scenario, investors should start by asking themselves what problem they are looking to hedge funds to solve. While global macro and multi-strategy funds seem well placed to weather the current environment, strong managers in any strategy can still deliver returns. March was an example of how bad liquidity can get in fixed income and equity markets so selecting the best managers with a careful eye on liquidity is of the utmost importance. We believe funds with a market neutral or variable net bias should be best placed to protect capital and offer investors the best risk-adjusted returns in a post-COVID world.
Source: Aurum’s proprietary Hedge Fund Data Engine database containing data on over 4,000 hedge funds representing in excess of $2.9 trillion of assets as at June 2020. Information in the database is derived from multiple sources including Aurum’s own research, regulatory filings, public registers and other database providers. The box represents the interquartile range, the middle line represents the median, the ‘x’ represents the mean, while the whiskers show the extreme values represented by the 10th and 90th percentiles.
A version of this piece originally appeared online in HedgeNews Africa’s publication, Hedge Fund & Alternative Manager Directory 2020/2021 in the Education section on 20th October 2020. The Hedge Fund & Alternative Manager Directory 2020/2021 is a publication targeted at a wide range of financial intermediaries and financial service professionals.
This Post represents the views of the author and their own economic research and analysis. These views do not necessarily reflect the views of Aurum Fund Management Ltd. This Post does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or an endorsement of any interest in an Aurum Fund or any other fund, or an endorsement for any particular trade, trading strategy or market.
This Post is directed at persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments in unregulated collective investment schemes, and should only be used by such persons or investment professionals. Hedge Funds may employ trading methods which risk substantial or complete loss of any amounts invested. The value of your investment and the income you get may go down as well as up. Any performance figures quoted refer to the past and past performance is not a guarantee of future performance or a reliable indicator of future results. Returns may also increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. An investment such as those described in this Post should be regarded as speculative and should not be used as a complete investment programme.
This Post is for informational purposes only and not to be relied upon as investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Whilst the information contained in this Post (including any expression of opinion or forecast) has been obtained from, or is based on, sources believed by Aurum to be reliable, it is not guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. This Post is current only at the date it was first published and may no longer be true or complete when viewed by the reader. This Post is provided without obligation on the part of Aurum and its associated companies and on the understanding that any persons who acting upon it or changes their investment position in reliance on it does so entirely at their own risk. In no event will Aurum or any of its associated companies be liable to any person for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages arising out of any use or reliance on this Post, even if Aurum is expressly advised of the possibility or likelihood of such damages.
You may also like
Monthly hedge fund performance review – April 2023
Hedge fund performance was generally positive in April; the average hedge fund net return across all strategies was 0.51%. April was a month of lower volatility…
Hedge fund industry performance deep dive – Q1 2023
In summary… Global growth surprised markets positively in Q1 2023. Global equities*** and bonds** returned 6.35% and 3.19% respectively. Strategies…
Aurum’s quarterly review – Q1 2023
Performance for Aurum’s commingled fund of hedge funds’ $US classes ranged from marginally negative to -2.4% for Q1. While Aurum’s portfolios delivered…
Monthly hedge fund performance review – March 2023
Hedge fund performance was mixed in March, the average hedge fund net return across all strategies was -0.39%. Strategies exhibiting a higher beta to equities…
A guide to hedge fund fees and redemption terms
In summary Investors determine whether hedge fund fees and redemption terms are appropriate through the manager selection process. Consideration is given…
Monthly hedge fund performance review – February 2023
Hedge fund performance was mixed in February, the average hedge fund net return across all strategies was -0.19%. Strategies with a higher beta to equities…
Monthly hedge fund performance review – January 2023
Hedge fund performance was generally positive in January, the average hedge fund net return across all strategies was 1.83%. Strategies with a higher beta…
Hedge fund industry performance deep dive – Full year 2022
The hedge fund industry was down 2.4% in 2022. Global equities** and global bonds*** have fallen 20.0% and 16.7% respectively. It has been an extremely…
Aurum’s quarterly review – Q4 2022
All of Aurum’s managed funds and bespoke accounts delivered positive returns in the fourth quarter of 2022. Performance for Aurum’s commingled fund…
Monthly hedge fund performance review – December 2022
Hedge fund performance was generally positive in December, the average hedge fund net return across all strategies was 0.50%. Strategies with a lower beta…
Monthly hedge fund performance review – November 2022
Hedge fund performance was generally positive in November, although underlying strategies had mixed performance. Long biased was the top performing master…